The University of Chicago Undergraduate Law Review (UCULR) is a student-run publication dedicated to the discussion, analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of a variety of legal issues. It aims to provide a better understanding of the law in all of its ambiguities and contradictions in order to reveal how complex compilations of regulatory components can not only serve as reflections of social attitudes towards general ideas of order, agency, consent, power, and choice, but influence the most minute details of everyday life.
Abstract: The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) scheme was first announced by President Barack Obama in 2012, and subsequently extended in 2014. DACA allows for illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria to apply for deferred action status, which exempts them from deportation proceedings for two-year periods. From its inception, the Administration has justified DACA’s legality based on the notion of “prosecutorial discretion,” that is, the wide latitude given to the government in deciding whether to initiate prosecutions for legal violations. Nevertheless, DACA has been the subject of fierce controversy since 2012: critics of the Administration maintain that it represents an impermissible abdication of the President’s constitutional duties, and amounts to a unconstitutional act of law-making by the President. This article argues that DACA represents a lawful exercise of prosecutorial discretion, but that President Obama’s overuse of the concept may have unwelcome consequences for the constitutionally-enacted balance of power between Congress and the President.
Author: Yuan Yi Zhu is a fourth-year at McGill University, majoring in Political Science and History.
FEATURED BLOG POST
Abstract: In an effort to settle small-claim civil cases in an expedient and less-costly fashion, the court systems of England and Wales are considering an online dispute resolution service. The proposed Her Majesty’s Online Court would conduct all proceedings using an online platform, without the need for either party to use an attorney. Though it is still an idea on paper, this system has the potential to not only drastically change the way in which civil justice is carried out, but to also revolutionize access to it.
Author: Adia Sykes is a third-year undergraduate in the College studying Anthropology and Spanish.